Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Thursday, July 1, 2010
I'm just giddy about this. We OPML'd the DoD. Specifically, we published OPML for Joint Capability Areas. It turned out to be so easy, too. I wish I could easily convey the significance of this achievement.
You see, JCAs are published in formats that are only readable by people, and not in formats that can be used by tools. As a result, people repeatedly spend unnecessary time manually keying in JCAs just so they can be available for menu items, pick lists, and other input forms in their software applications. This is inefficient, error prone, and easily solved by publishing JCAs in Outline Processor Markup Language
Sunday, June 27, 2010
It's too hard to ask a simple question about a city and get a simple answer.
- Where is the location of each road and intersection under construction in my city?
- How long has road/intersection X been under construction?
- When will road/intersection X construction project be complete?
- What is the list of each building construction permit in my city?
- Where is the location of each building construction permit in my city?
- What is the list of businesses that pay taxes in my city?
- What is the list of businesses that pay taxes in my city, by type of business?
- What is the list of how much each business paid in taxes in my city?
- Where is the location of each business that pays taxes in my city?
- What is the list of neighborhoods in my city?
- How many houses are in each neighborhood in my city?
- What is the list of schools in the city? (This should include private and church schools, too, if these schools are required to be registered with the city.)
- What is the location of each school in my city?
- What is the enrollment at each school in my city?
- How many cars are registered in my city?
- What is the list of most traveled streets in my city?
- What is the list of traffic accidents in my city?
- Where are the locations of each traffic accident in my city?
- How many pounds of garbage are collected in my city?
- How many pounds of garbage are collected in my city, by zipcode?
- How many pounds of garbage are collected in my city, by neighborhood?
- What is the list of events in my city?
- When are events occurring in my city, by time period?
- Where are events occurring in my city?
- What is the list of conditional use permits in my city?
- What is the list of all emergency response stations (fire, police, medical) in my city?
- Where are the locations of each emergency response station in my city?
- What is the number of emergency calls in my city, by time period?
- What is the list of stations responding to emergency calls, by time period?
- What is the frequency of emergency calls by station and time period?
Last year my city was considering closing one or two schools (HamptonRoads.com, WAVY.com). One of the justifications cited was decline in student enrollment. Though I can no longer find it anywhere online, one of the enrollment artifacts put forth was this image of a column chart from a (presumably) Excel spreadsheet.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
I'm tempted to not provide a narrative for this. The pictures really tell the story.
I was reading an article from my local "paper," The Virginian-Pilot, online. When I finished the article I noticed the "Quick Links" just below. To my pleasant surprise, the first category of links was "Databases." Truth be told, I'm not that surprised to find data at The Pilot, but what unfolded when I followed that link was far from the norm when it comes to online (local) journalism and data.
I clicked the link to "School Violence" and found the following page. If you look closely you will see there is a form:
What if more news organizations published databases? What if journalists had a habit of digging into those databases with with these simple tools? Would we create better news products? Would we become more accurately and insightfully informed as citizens? Would our governments, businesses, and civic organizations make wiser strategy and better decisions? And if we think that the answer to any of these questions is yes, how do we sustain the "model?"
Monday, March 29, 2010
As I start this post I'm on the Orange line of the Metro heading home from Transparency Camp 2010. I timed my arrival almost exactly with that of the train using an iPhone app. Now I'm typing on a super-powerful laptop with a huge display. Many Metro stations have 3G access and even though I don't tether my phone to my computer to use 3G on my laptop, I'm sure it can be done. I have nearly all of the comforts of the digital age at my disposal nearly all of the time.
I often use these tools to stay in touch with what is happening in and around my community, my local and state governments, and the federal government. I use access to Web sites, data, and social networks to stay informed and engaged. These tools offer me many choices of how much info I want to consume and how much I feel like engaging.
But what can people who don't have these resources do to be informed and participate? What choices do they have for receiving information and offering feedback? So much of Gov 2.0 and open government relates to the Web that we must be careful not to exclude those who lack digital resources.
This topic came up in multiple sessions at Transparency Camp and we generated some good ideas (we think) on how to address this issue responsibly. One idea in particular that resonated was placing LED message boards around town to broadcast key indicators, initiatives, and citizen feedback.
The basic idea is to place LED signs at heavily trafficked locations. These signs would display information about the city in which people are most interested. Some of this content would be generated the city and some of the content would be generated by citizens. Information, especially that generated by citizens, would vary somewhat by neighborhood.
On the participation side of the conversation the minimum barrier to entry would be a mobile phone. Anyone who can send a text message can contribute. Of course, there would be other ways to contribute. On the information side of the equation would be these message boards.
This would be a way for people to simultaneously tell their city what they want and to see what the city is getting by way of feedback.
There is plenty of reason to think this can be effective, too.
But before I go on, I need to add some context. This all came up during a session I facilitated called "Local Government Transparency." In the beginning of the session I gave several examples of transparency happening at the local level. One example was Localocracy. Hart Rossman quickly pointed out that, while I'm able to easily cite these examples, most people hardly know what I'm even talking about. The point being: we need to make this relevant to the vast majority of people who aren't aware of what's going on in this space.
Keying on that, Bryan Sivak, CTO of Washington, D.C., shared with us his concerns about the "digital divide" in his city. In the poorest wards in D.C., broadband Internet access is about 30%. The point being: we can make all the cool open data and participation websites we want, but we won't be serving key constituencies in his city if those people can't access these online resources.
After some back and forth a gentlemen, whose name regrettably escapes me at the moment made a reference that reminded me very much of "The Blackboard Blogger of Monrovia," Alfred Sirleaf. Alfred is not just dealing with a digital divide. He has customers who are not literate. Still, he manages to provide useful information about what matters around them.
At lesser extremes we see other examples of this idea already working. Metro transit signs are one great example.
What else do people want to know about their city that can be easily provided on on a billboard in the public square?
It's worth noting that we don't necessarily need government to provide (and maintain) the billboard. Alfred Sirleaf makes a living doing what he does. People who visit his blackboard buy goods from him. We probably need government to issue permits for signs in public spaces. Then again, What if food vendors in D.C. hung LEDs on their carts?
We do need from government data that is open and accessible so that it can be easily used by anyone at low or no cost. Given this and a touch of inspiration from Alfred Sirleaf, maybe we can succeed at engaging citizens in their own government in ways that are widely accessible.
Gwynne Kostin pointed out the next day, that the digital divide is as much cultural as it is economical. There are plenty of people who aren't resource constrained who are nonetheless struggling with relevance of transparency and open government in their lives.
Thank you to Erik Hersman for the image of Alfred Sirleaf
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Saturday, February 6, 2010
At the start of the second day of City Camp we challenged ourselves to think about what happens after City Camp. We focused our sessions around concrete actions we would take after we all scattered back to our homes. Here's a quick rundown of some of our post-City Camp activities:
- We've been editing the Open Muni wiki
- We started a help-desk for journalists who want to use data
- We're planning spin-offs and meet-ups in a number of different cities
- We connected experts in crime data mashup & visualization with a local paper's crime data API
- We stay active online
- We started Colorado Smart Communities
- We reported back to local government
- Update 02.15.10: We set up a development environment for open source government data feeds
- [Participate in] Inter-city collaboration
- [Contribute to] Open Data Cookbook
- Experiment in 3D virtual worlds
- Develop understanding and excitement internally
- [Initiate] Apps for Edmonton
- [Support creation of] Code for Canada
Saturday, January 30, 2010
I posted this in a comment thread in GovLoop; copying here so it can be read without requiring a login:
It's essential to get a good mix of perspective. We had civil servants, vendors, journalists, non-profits, and citizens. It would not have been as successful if it was gov-to-gov, vendor-to-vendor, or even gov-to-vendor.
It's essential that the conversation not revolve entirely around tech and data. In 2010 we can assume that technology and data are involved. We're just scratching the surface on process. And the processes involved are not just about methods and means for collecting-publishing-visualizing data. Providing greater opportunities to get citizens' voices heard and to increase their engagement in civic duty is important.
There is a new and important role for journalism: tell the stories behind the tech and the data. However, journalists may not have the education and knowledge to do this well. Interpreting stats is hard. I am excited to see Global Integrity stepping up to start a "help desk" specifically to work this problem. I think there is a new "extreme programming" model that papers could adopt; or perhaps to put it in terms papers already understand: pair your journalists up with data-viz-stats people like you pair them up with photographers.
People want what City Camp provided. We are going to learn from it, refine it, and keep it going.
Don't wait for me or Jen to keep City Camp going. Anyone can do this anywhere at anytime. Copy what works. Adapt for your local perspective. Just do it.